Introduction
We received a letter from Channel 5 UK asking what we knew about the above
character as she was mentioned in one of our Countdowns. They wanted to do a
program for about half an hour on her under the title of "the most evil men and
women in history" and would we take the Christian viewpoint? So we said yes to
the program and carried on doing the research. The following is that research:
Henry VII (1485-1509) married his eldest son, Prince Arthur, to Catherine of
Aragon. Arthur died soon after, and a special dispensation was obtained from the
Pope for Catherine to marry Arthur's brother Henry (the future Henry VIII).
Henry VIII (1509-1547) was desperate for a male heir to succeed him, but
Catherine gave him only one surviving child, Mary. Henry wanted to divorce her
(claiming their sonlessness was evidence of God's disapproval of their marriage)
and marry his mistress Anne Boleyn, but the Pope refused. Henry therefore broke
with Rome and made himself the head of the church of England Henry divorced
Catherine and married Anne, she gave birth to Elizabeth. Subsequently he married
Jane Seymour, who gave him his only son, Edward.
Edward VI (1547-1553) was a Protestant who advanced the cause of the
Reformation during this short reign. He was succeeded by Catherine's daughter,
Mary I (1553-1558). Mary, married to king Philip II of Spain, was a Catholic who
sought to reintroduce Catholicism to England During her reign over 200
Protestant were burned at the Stake, hence the name "Bloody Mary". She died
childless and was succeeded by Anne Boleyn's daughter Elizabeth I (1558-1603).
She reimposed Protestantism, and now it was the turn of Catholics to be
persecuted. Life was cheap at that time.
She was born a healthy baby and gave every indication of surviving. Henry and
Catharine, compared to other royal marriages of the time they were a typical
devoted married couple. They had a public tenderness for each other that was
rarely found in arranged marriages and into this family Mary was welcomed with
affection from both her parents.
After her Christening, in which she was named Mary after the King's younger
sister, she was sent to live in her own household. She was brought to court on
special occasions and Henry, fond of babies, liked to carry Mary and show her
off to the court claiming that "she never cries". She was always small for her
age and tended toward thinness. At the age of 2 she was engaged for the first
time, to the dauphin of France
Mary received a superior education and given the best tutors and studied the
works of leading scholars. She spoke Latin, French, Spanish and understood
Italian, learned the basic skill of riding side -saddle, sewing and embroidery
and had a natural musical talent.
When Henry found he lacked a son he took a recognised mistress, Elizabeth
Blount who in 1519 presented him with a son named Henry. He was to have
precedence over everyone in court, even Mary. Mary was sent to Ludlow castle in
Wales at the age of 9. When she returned to London in 1527 her whole life was
turned upside down because the king had fallen in love.
Henry VIII was also attracted to Anne Boleyn daughter of Thomas Boleyn partly
because of her cool determination and went with him everywhere. Then because
Anne became pregnant Henry married her quickly and got rid of Catherine by
shutting her up in Kimbolton Castle. Mary separated from her mother, lived her
early teen years in confusion. Torn between the two people she wanted to please
most in life.
Anne gave Henry a daughter Elizabeth. Mary was now described as Lady Mary in
correspondence. Not Princess. Henry was angry at Mary's defiance at demotion,
forced her to live at Hatfield to join Princess Elisabeth's household. When she
refused to curtsy to the "Princess" she was locked in her room.
Then Henry produced an Oath of Succession that if people did not obey they
could lose their head. Mary thought she would lose hers if she did not escape to
Europe. In 1535 Catherine died. Ann Boleyn was arrested and tried for adultery.
The marriage to Henry annulled. Henry wanted Mary to announce Papal supremacy
and she at first refused to sign. With the threat of the Tower she did and was
allowed to return to court. She was now twenty years old.
Anne Boleyn may have disliked Catherine of Aragon but she hated Mary. At one
social occasion when the Boleyn appeared Henry told Mary to leave which she did.
Anne was executed on May.
Jane Seymour was 27 and more accommodating. Mary was allowed to walk beside
Jane and not behind. Jane gave Henry a son.
In keeping with his title as head of the Church of England, Henry closed
nearly all religious houses associated with the Pope. Henry's new religion
stressed that the practice of worship of relics and pilgrimages be abandoned. To
Mary, though, the dissolution of the monasteries represent all that was wrong
with her father's country and against all her teaching. She was known to give
charity to displaced nuns and monks who came to her.
Catherine Parr suggested to Mary that she undertake a translation of Erasmus'
paraphrases of the New Testament. Mary enjoyed this work.
Mary came to the throne under the most popular demonstrations of enthusiasm
that had ever existed for an English monarch. The crowds were thick in the
streets with church bells ringing. She had become dangerously close to not being
Queen. Mary's first act was to order the crucifix to be set up in the parish
church. It was all a miracle to Mary In Mary's mind God had opened the way for
her to bring people back to the only true religion.
At first Mary acted slowly on religion and appeared to compromise. She was
coronated on October 1. 1553. Her first act was to repeal the divorce of Henry
declaring the marriage lawful. When Mary decided to marry her cousin Philip of
Spain; the country began to worry. The loyalty of the city seemed to be in doubt
and it was Mary herself who saved the day by her public speaking ability.
She began secret negotiations with the Pope soon after becoming Queen. The
Pope appointed the Englishman Pole to be his ligate in England who advised Mary
to move quickly in returning England to Rome but Mary argued that his would take
time. The Act for the Burning of Heretics of 1401 was renewed. The burnings
began in February 1555.
She realised that she would never feel completely safe until all heretics
were shown the outcome of disobedience. The population had great respect for the
martyrs and some spoke out against the burnings. Soon there would be anger from
the people because Mary had interfered with the right the condemned had to
recant.
Now there was no way, once condemned, to save their lives. Her acts were now
backfiring upon her.
The Church of England is not mentioned in the bible; Rome is, but in a
negative light.
Henry must have read the bible or understood a bit about it because he
referred to it.
Lev 20:21 "And if a man shall take his brother's wife, it is an unclean
thing: he hath uncovered his brother's nakedness; they shall be childless."
Henry the VIII misunderstood this scripture. He had married his LATE
brother's wife. I.e. the brother was dead. The fact that Henry had NOT been
childless, i.e. he had had a child in Mary showed that he was
not breaking God's law.
So he must have also known that he was sitting on the throne of David (as the
Catholic church does) and that David would never lack someone to sit on the
throne. I.e it would go on forever.
Mary must have known about the Old Testament from her Father and as it was
suggested that she study the New Testament by translating from Erasmus? she must
have had at least some knowledge of both the old and new. i.e. That thou shalt
not kill.
1 John 4:1, 2 "Hereby know ye the spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth
that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God."
Did Mary speak of God? Yes. She was however much more aware of and under the
influence of the Pope of Rome.
No crying as a child. This indicates that she was a very tough individual.
No way of escape or to "recant" the English are known for the idea of
fairness or having an escape route. Mary wanted only to destroy opposition,
which she did.
Paid homage to pope; Latinos; 666 or the beast. Mary's reign was very short
as a result.
Catholics practice the worship of relics. One must worship the creator not
the created.
Channel 5 then contacted us to say did we mind letting the program manager
have a chat with us. We did not mind. Channel 5 never contacted us. We have
mixed feeling towards television companies now but hope you enjoyed this
article.
To date the people who have been anointed have shown positive effects. Either
their mind has been taken off their little toe or big toe or shoulder and they
have got on with their lives.
One person associated with us stopped smoking many months back and is only
suffering from the occasional panic attacks. Even when thinking positively about
someone has desirable effects. One person we know has had a bad neck. This
person I asked God to intervene in their lives and their doctor discovered a new
drug that relieves the pain.
Has been in the news recently and comes up from time to time. The question is
-do you pull the plug or don't you? Whiile there is deep trauma involved, I would
have thought that if the basic laws of God are used he provides a way out. Once
a person has been anointed and one asks God to intervene and the doctors have
been involved; then one should ask God to take the persons life or heal them. It
is then in Gods hands. It is uncomfortable which ever way it goes.
This topic came about because of investigating the "test the spirits" idea
associated with Mary Tudor.
Unfortunately as time goes on we realised that Herbert Armstrong really did
not know as much about the bible as we thought and this is by delving into his
books. In this particular case The Incredible human potential; and the topic,
Spirit beings and death.
The actual wording used in his book is- Angels are immortal Spirit
beings and cannot die. Page 41. The incredible human potential, by
Herbert W Armstrong; middle of the page. ISBN # 0-932694-01-2.
For such an important idea there is interestingly no
scriptural reference point.
The scripture that has been used to
attempt to show that Satan goes on forever was Rev. 20:10 Where
it is stated that "And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of
fire and brimstone, where the beast and false prophet are, and shall be
tormented day and night for ever and ever." A reference is also
made to Rev. 14:10-11.
The thinking then went on to reason that Satan was then going to be
permanently put in a hole in the ground and trapped there
forever, tormenting over what "might have been".
God has just recently opened my mind and others in revealing that Satan will
die. No where in the bible does it say that spirit beings
cannot be destroyed. The reverse is true. With God all things are
possible. Matt.19:26
It is well known that angels can materialize and dematerialize. Gen.18:2 and
Heb.13:2 show this. It is also well known in true Christian circles that Jesus
Christ came in the flesh. So that, (as is also well known) that as HE existed
from eternity as the Word, HE then divested himself of all of his power and
became a normal flesh and blood human being.
As regards living a sin free life, it is well known that Christ could have
"blown" it by sinning. This he did not do even when hanging on
the stake. It was a case of "thy will be done".
It is recorded that he died in Matt 27:50; Mark 15:37; 2 Cor. 5:15 and Rom.
14:9. For all intents and purposes this guy was now destroyed. The Romans were
happy with the idea and the Jews even more so. He was destroyed. If his body had
lain more than 3 days in the tomb it would have had to be buried because of
smelly decomposition or burned to become ashes.
The point to be got across here is that here we have a being that had
been a spirit being once; and that when he had "given up the
ghost" (died, as a flesh and blood one) he was
destroyed. We call it just being dead.
But now let's get back to Rev. 20:10
"And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and
brimstone, where the beast and false prophet are, and shall be tormented
day and night for ever and ever."
The question that came to my mind was-does tormented day and night
for ever and ever -mean to be continually tormented for ever going
into billions of years down throughout eternity ahead of us?
The answer starts to come through with II Peter 2:4-5: "For if God spared not
the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered then into
chains of darkness, to be reserved unto
Judgment; and spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eight person, a
preacher of righteousness, bringing the flood upon the world of the ungodly.---
It becomes even clearer when we read in Jude 6- And the angels which kept not
their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in
everlasting chains under darkness unto
the judgment of the great day.
Satan and his demons are in chains of darkness now but have
influence in the world now. For 1000 years they will be held in
a pit so that they have absolutely no influence in the kingdom of God.
They will be released for a little season.
Now Herbert when he referred to the subject of the downfall of lucifer,
referred to Ezek. 28:12, where thou sealest up the sum, been in Eden, created,
anointed; and then we come to verse 16, which doesn't quite fit in with
Herbert's ideas of stopping or ending, ever lastingness for spirit beings who
sin. So that on page 50 of the same book he writes-"and I will destroy [remove]
thee." Whereas the bible says and I will
destroy thee, O covering Cherub. Herbert does not use the term
destroy but just remove.
Finally, verse 18. This is also conveniently forgotten as it
does not fit in with his scheme of things that spirit beings that sin, do not go
on forever.
Verse 18 says: "and I will bring thee to ashes upon the
earth in the sight of all them that behold thee." Then to confirm this, verse 19
says- "All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee:
thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be ANY
MORE".
Malachi 4:3 also confirms this. "And ye shall tread down the wicked for they
shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in the day that I
shall do this, saith the lord of hosts." Rom. 16:20 "And the God of peace shall
bruise Satan under your feet".
And as Rev. 20: 14 points out, this is the second death.
It is also quite clear from the recent massacre of the Jews in PALESTINE on
the Passover night that God is not with them. These are
the Jews that call themselves Jews but are not- as Koestler pointed out they
were born gentile NOT of Judaen blood. Their actions toward Arafat (a Nobel
peace winner) has shocked the world. They are now going to face their true
holocaust. About 1/6 th of them will be left in the
first round.
Editors comments
To date we have not found any errors
Where did we get Christmas? from the Bible, or paganism?
Here are astonishing FACTS which may shock you! Do you know the origin of
Christmas tree - of "Santa Claus, of the mistletoe, holly-wreath,-custom of
exchanging gifts?
Introduction: when I was growing up I believed in Santa Claus and the
celebration of Christmas. I got married and had children. I did not want to
teach my children that it was okay to tell a lie. If they found out that I was
lying about Santa Claus . . . they might wonder if I was telling the truth about
Jesus Christ. In mid-1955 I came across this booklet, "The Plain Truth about
Christmas." It opened my eyes to the truth about Christmas. I am reprinting it
hoping it will be as helpful to you as it was to me.
Tom Justus, Pastor
Church of God, Sabbath Day
Springdale, Arkansas
September, 1997
Presented By: Church of God UK
Does Christmas really celebrate the birthday of Jesus? Was He born on
December 25th? Did Paul, the apostles, and the early Church of the New Testament
celebrate Christmas? Do you know what the BIBLE says about the Christmas tree?
Stop and think! Very few know WHY we do the things we do, or WHERE our
customs came from! We were born into a world filled with customs. We grew up
practising them, taking them for granted, but NEVER QUESTIONING WHY!
We have supposed CHRISTMAS to be the chief of the Christian holidays. Without
asking questions, we have blindly assumed its observance must be one of the
principle teachings and commands of the New Testament. We have supposed Jesus
was born December 25th, and that the New Testament set this day aside as the
chief Christian festival. We have supposed we exchange gifts because the wise
men presented gifts to the Christ-child.
But, let's quit supposing, and look into history and the Bible for the FACTS!
The word "Christmas" means "Mass of Christ" or, as it later became shortened,
"Christ-Mass." It came to us as a Roman Catholic mass. And where did they get
it? From the HEATHEN celebration of December 25th, as the birthday of Sol the
SUN-GOD! It is, actually, an ancient rite of BAALISM, which the Bible condemns
as the most abominable of all idolatrous worship!
It is not so much as MENTIONED anywhere in the New Testament. It was never
observed by Paul, the apostles, the early true Christian church!
The idea that Jesus was born December 25th, is one of the FABLES the Apostle
Paul prophesied (11 Tim. 4:4) would deceive the world in these latter days.
The plain truth is, Christmas is NOT Christ's birthday at all! And this
festival, important as it seems to so many, is not of Christian, but of pagan
Babylonish-origin! But does that make any difference? Isn't it all right to go
ahead and observe it anyway? Isn't the "Christmas SPIRIT" a good and splendid
thing, regardless of how it got started? WE SHALL SEE!
Now let's look to the interesting PROOF! When was Jesus born?
Jesus was not even born in the winter season! When the Christ-child was born
"there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch
over their flock by night" (Luke 2:8). This never could have occurred in
Palestine in the month of December. The shepherds always brought their flocks
from the mountain sides and fields and corralled them not later than October 15,
to protect them from the cold rainy season that followed that date. Notice that
the Bible itself proves in Song of Solomon 2:1 1, and Ezra 10:9, and 13, that
winter was a rainy season not permitting shepherds to abide in open fields at
night.
It was an ancient custom among Jews of those days to send out their sheep to
the fields and deserts about the Passover (early-spring), and bring them home at
commencement of the first rain, says the Adam Clarke Commentary, Vol. 5., page
386.
Continuing, this authority states: "during the time they were out, the
shepherds watched them night and day. As ... the first rain began early in the
month of Marchesvan, which answers to part of our October and November [begins
mid October], we find that the sheep were kept out in the open country during
the whole summer. And, as these shepherds had not yet brought home their flocks,
it is a presumptive argument that October had not yet commenced, and that,
consequently, our Lord was not born on the 25th, of December, when no flocks
were out in the fields; nor could He have been born later than September, as the
flocks were still in the fields by night. On this very ground, the nativity in
December should be given up. The feeding of the flocks by night in the fields is
a chronological fact . . . See the quotations from the Talmudists in Light
foot."
Any encyclopaedia, or any other authority, will tell you that Christ was not
born on December 25. The Catholic Encyclopaedia frankly states this fact. The
exact date of Jesus' birth is entirely UNKNOWN, as all
authorities acknowledge - tho if I had space in this booklet I could show you
Scriptures which at least strongly indicate that it was in the early
fall-probably September-approximately six months after Passover.
If God had wished us to observe and celebrate Christ's birthday, He would not
have so completely hidden the exact date.
There is not one word in the New Testament, or anywhere in the Bible, telling
us to observe Christmas. The Christians of the first century, under the inspired
teachings of Peter and Paul and the other apostles, never observed it. There is
NO BIBLE AUTHORITY for its observance, strange as it may seem.
Then where did we get "Christmas"? Since it has come to us thru the Roman
Catholic Church, and has no authority but that of the Roman Catholic Church, let
us examine the Catholic Encyclopaedia, published by that Church. Under the
caption "Christmas," you will find:
"Christmas was not among the earliest festivals of the Church . . . The first
evidence of the feast is, from Egypt." "Pagan customs centring around the
January calends gravitated to Christmas." And, further, we find this truth
acknowledged: " . . . in the Scripture, sinners alone, not saints, celebrate
their birthday.
Encyclopaedia Britannica has this: "Christmas (i.e., the Mass of Christ).
Christmas was not among the earliest festivals of the church . . . ." It was not
instituted by Christ or the apostles, or by Bible authority-it was picked up
afterward from paganism.
The Encyclopaedia Americana says: "CHRISTMAS. It was, according to many
authorities, not celebrated in the first centuries of the Christian church, as
the Christian usage in general was to celebrate the death of remarkable persons
rather than their birth . . ." (The "Communion" which is instituted by New
Testament Bible authority, is a memorial of the DEATH of Christ.) ". . . a feast
was established in memory of this event [Christ's birth] in the. fourth century.
In the fifth century the Western Church ordered it to be celebrated forever on
the day of the old Roman feast of the birth of Sol, as no certain knowledge of
the day of Christ's birth existed."
Now notice! These recognized historic authorities show Christmas was NOT
observed by Christians for the first two or three hundred years-a period longer
than the entire history of the United States as a nation! It got into the
Western, or Roman Church, by the FOURTH century A.D. It was not until the FIFTH
century that the Roman Church ordered it to be celebrated as an official
"Christian" festival!
Then HOW did this heathen custom CREEP INTO a so-called Christianity?
The Schaff-Herzog Encyclopaedia explains it clearly, in its article on
"CHRISTMAS:" "How much the date of the festival depended upon the Pagan Brumalia
(Dec. 25) following the Saturnalia (Dec. 17-24), and celebrating the shortest
day of the year and the "new sun" . . . cannot be accurately determined. The
pagan Saturnalia and Brumalia were too deeply entrenched in popular custom to be
set aside by Christian influence . . . The pagan festival with its riot and
merrymaking was so popular that Christians were glad of an excuse to continue
its celebration with little change in spirit and in manner. Christian preachers
of the West and the Near East protested against the unseemly frivolity with
which Christ's birthday was celebrated, while Christians of Mesopotamia accused
their Western brethren of idolatry and sun-worship for adopting as Christian
this pagan, festival. "
Remember, the Roman world had been PAGAN. Prior to the fourth century,
Christians were few in number, tho increasing, and were persecuted by the
government and by pagans. But, with the advent of Constantine as emperor, who
made his profession of Christianity, in the fourth century, placing Christianity
on an equal footing with paganism, people of the Roman world began to accept
this now popular Christianity by the hundreds of thousands.
But remember, these people had grown up in PAGAN customs, chief of which was
this idolatrous festival of December 25th. It was a festival of merry~ making,
with is special SPIRIT. They ENJOYED it! They didn't want to give it up! Now
this same article in Schaff-Herzog Encyclopaedia explains how the recognition by
Constantine, of Sunday, which had been the day of pagan SUN WORSHIP, and how the
influence of the pagan Manichaeism, which identified the SON of God with the
physical SUN, gave these pagans of the fourth century, now turning over
wholesale to "Christianity", their EXCUSE for calling their pagan-festival date
of December 25th (birthday of the SUN-god), the birthday of the SON of God.
And that is how "Christmas" got into our so-called Christianity! We may call
it by another NAME, but it's the same old pagan sun~worshipping festival still!
The only CHANGE is in what we CALL IT! You can call a rabbit a "LION:' but it's
a RABBIT, just the same.
Again from the Britannica: "Certain Latins, as early as 354, may have
transferred the birthday from January 6th to December 25, which was then a
Mithraic feast, . . . or birthday of the unconquered SUN ... The Syrians and
Armenians, who clung to January 6th, accused the Romans of SUN-WORSHIP and
IDOLATRY, contending that the feast of December 25th, had been invented by
disciples of Cerinthus . . ."
But if we got Christmas from the Roman Catholics, and they got it from
paganism, where did the pagans get it? Where, when, and what was its real
origin?
It is a chief custom of the corrupt system denounced all thru Bible
prophecies and teachings under the name of BABYLON. And it started and
originated in the original Babylon of ancient Nimrod! Yes, it stems from roots
whose beginning was shortly this side of the Flood!
Nimrod, grandson of Ham, son of Noah, was the real founder of the Babylonish
system that has gripped the world ever since-the system of organized
competition-of man-ruled governments and empires, based upon the competitive and
profit making economic system. Nimrod built the tower of Babel, the original
Babylon, ancient Nineveh, and many other cities. He organized this world's first
kingdom. The name Nimrod, in Hebrew, is derived from "Marad," meaning "he
rebelled." (Gen. 10:6, 8-12)
From many ancient writings, considerable is learned of this man, who started
the great organized worldly apostasy from God that has dominated this world
until now. Nimrod was so evil, it is said he married his own mother, whose name
was Semiramis. After Nimrod's untimely death, his so called mother-wife,
Semiramis, propagated the evil doctrine of the survival of Nimrod as a spirit
being. She claimed a full-grown evergreen tree sprang over-night from a dead
tree stump, which symbolized the springing forth unto new life of the dead
Nimrod. On each anniversary of his birth, she claimed, Nimrod would visit the
evergreen tree and leave gifts upon it. December 25th, was the birthday of
Nimrod. This is the real origin of the Christmas tree.
Thru her scheming and designing, Semiramis became the Babylonian "Queen of
Heaven," and Nimrod, under various names, became the "divine son of heaven."
Thru the generations, in this idolatrous worship, Nimrod also became the false
Messiah, son of Baal the Sun-god. In this false Babylonish system, the "Mother
and Child", (Semiramis and Nimrod reborn); became chief objects of worship. This
worship of "Mother and Child" spread over the world. The names varied in
different countries and languages. In Egypt it was Iris and Osiris. In Asia,
Cybele and Deoius. In Pagan Rome, Fortuna and Jupiterpuer. Even in Greece,
China, Japan, Tibet are to be found the counterpart of the Madonna, long before
the birth of Christ!
Thus, during the fourth and fifth centuries, when the pagans of the Roman
world were "accepting" the new popular "Christianity" by the hundreds of
thousands, carrying their old pagan customs and beliefs along with them, merely
cloaking them with Christian-sounding NAMES, the Madonna and "Mother and Child"
idea also became popularized, especially at Christmas time. Every Christmas
season you'll hear sung and chanted dozens of times the hymn "Silent Night, Holy
Night," with its familiar "Mother and Child" theme. We, who have been born in
such a babylonish world, reared and steeped in these things all our lives, have
been taught to revere these things as holy, and sacred. WE NEVER QUESTIONED TO
SEE WHERE THEY CAME FROM-WHETHER THEY CAME FROM THE BIBLE, OR FROM PAGAN
IDOLATRY!
We are SHOCKED to learn the TRUTH-some, unfortunately, take offense at the
PLAIN TRUTH! But God commands His faithful ministers, "CRY ALOUD, spare not,
lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and SHOW MY PEOPLE THEIR TRANSGRESSIONS!"
Shocking as these facts are, they are the plain facts of history and the Bible!
The real origin of Christmas goes back to the ancient Babylon. It is bound up
in the organized apostasy with which Satan has gripped a deceived world these
many centuries! In Egypt, it was always believed that the son of Iris (Egyptian
name for "Queen of Heaven") was born December 25th. Paganism celebrated this
famous birthday over most of the known world for centuries before the birth of
Christ. To be contd.
Church of God African HQ, P.O. BOX 65 Prestea; West Region; Ghana; West
Africa
It was while in the WWCG under HWA that we were led to believe that as the
Eternal goes on forever, being a spirit being; so Jesus Christ also being a
spirit being; goes on forever. That Lucifer was created a spirit being and so
also goes on forever i.e. that spirit cannot be destroyed.
We are now going to go through the process of weeding out dead wood. IF you
are a person that has made contributions to the magazine in one form or another
then you will have no problem. We are weeding out the unprofitable servants. As
a minimum you could send us a letter of encouragement to say what a brilliant
magazine we are producing!!!. It does cost about £1.40 to send airmail letters
overseas. We have done our best in this by putting two magazines in one
envelope. The other is that in one years time I will have retired and the income
will drop somewhat. No I am not a millionaire if you think that.